首页> 外文OA文献 >Transparent Stakeholder Engagement in Practice: Lessons Learned from Applying Comprehensive Environmental Assessment to Research Planning for Nanomaterials
【2h】

Transparent Stakeholder Engagement in Practice: Lessons Learned from Applying Comprehensive Environmental Assessment to Research Planning for Nanomaterials

机译:透明的利益相关者参与实践:将综合环境评估应用于纳米材料研究规划的经验教训

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

As efforts to develop new applications of engineered nanoscale materials (ENMs) continue to grow, so too has interest in the environmental, health, and safety (EHS) implications of these materials. However, thorough evaluation and interpretation of such implications could require substantial resources (e.g., estimated as \u3e$120 million per year in federal funding 2013– 2017). A structured, strategic approach for transparently planning research would support improved linkages between ENM research and risk assessments, and thereby enhance the utility of financial and other resources for EHS studies of ENMs. For this reason, we applied Comprehensive Environmental Assessment (CEA) as an approach to provide transparent input into research planning for 2 types of ENMs: nanoscale titanium dioxide and nanoscale silver. For each of these CEA applications, we employed a collective judgment method known as Nominal Group Technique (NGT) in 2 workshops sponsored by the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). The objective of this paper is to present the outcomes of these CEA applications in the context of how our methodology can inform future efforts to identify collective goals in science (e.g., research priorities) through structured decision support approaches. Outcomes include clear lists of research priorities for each ENM developed through transparently engaging stakeholders having diverse technical and sector perspectives. In addition, we identified several procedural aspects that could be refined, including emphasizing breakout group interactions, identifying broad information priorities before more detailed research questions, and using rating rather than ranking prioritization methods. Beyond the research directions identified for specific ENMs, lessons learned about engaging stakeholders in research planning are expected to inform future research planning efforts for ENMs and other emerging materials across the scientific community.
机译:随着开发工程纳米级材料(ENM)的新应用的努力不断增长,对这些材料对环境,健康和安全(EHS)的影响也引起了人们的兴趣。但是,对此类影响进行彻底的评估和解释可能需要大量资源(例如,2013-2017年,联邦资金每年估计为1.2亿美元)。透明地规划研究的结构化,战略性方法将支持ENM研究与风险评估之间更好的联系,从而增强对ENM的EHS研究的财务和其他资源的利用。因此,我们应用了综合环境评估(CEA)作为为ENM的两种类型的研究计划提供透明输入的方法:纳米二氧化钛和纳米银。对于这些CEA申请中的每一项,我们在美国环境保护署(USEPA)主办的2个研讨会中采用了一种称为集体标称技术(NGT)的集体判断方法。本文的目的是在我们的方法如何通过结构化的决策支持方法为将来确定科学的集体目标(例如研究重点)提供信息时,介绍这些CEA应用程序的结果。结果包括通过透明地让具有不同技术和行业观点的利益相关者参与而制定的每个ENM的研究重点的清晰列表。此外,我们确定了几个可以改进的程序方面,包括强调分组讨论的互动,在更详细的研究问题之前确定广泛的信息优先级,以及使用评级而不是对优先级进行排序。除了为特定的ENM确定研究方向之外,有关使利益相关者参与研究计划的经验教训还有望为ENM和整个科学界其他新兴材料的未来研究计划工作提供参考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号